![]() ![]() In the interests of having enough data points to make for a worthwhile survey, we will only be covering the Top 7 packages, though many more were reported in the survey. In this installment, we’ll be covering the most common strengths and weaknesses the actual users of the packages reported. In part 2 we covered Customer Satisfaction. In Part 1 of the CNCCookbook 2016 CAD Survey we covered market share. The results give an unprecedented view into how real users react to the various packages. We didn’t pick categories, we simply asked folks to tell us the 3 things they liked most about their CAM software and the 3 biggest frustrations they were having with it. Moreover, when we ran the survey, the questions were open-ended. The ratings and information here are drawn entirely from those survey responses. ![]() Here at CNCCookbook, we’ve been offering a different kind of analysis of these packages because it’s based not on our view of the packages, but on the views of real users of the software as determined by our 2016 CAD Market Share and Usability Survey. The choice you make will impact your productivity for a long time. What sorts of things would you want to know before purchasing a new CAD Software Package? These packages are expensive, you’ll spend hours learning to use them effectively, and they make the difference between success or failure of your next CNC project. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |